perpaster.blogg.se

Mac users vs windows users percentage ch
Mac users vs windows users percentage ch





mac users vs windows users percentage ch

Version numbers, platform details, model information, etc. There’s quite a bit of information packed into those strings (along with a fair number of lies). While a recent version of Edge identifies itself as: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0 Win64 圆4)ĪppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/.79

Mac users vs windows users percentage ch mac os#

User agent in order to bypass misguided server-side heuristics, on the other.įor example, a recent version of Chrome on iOS identifies itself as: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone CPU iPhone OS 12_0 like Mac OS X) In practice, however, this header’s value exposes far more information about the user’sĭevice than seems appropriate as a default, on the one hand, and intentionally obscures the true Would give servers the ability to perform content negotiation, sending down exactly those bits thatīest represent the requested resource in a given user agent, optimizing both bandwidth and userĮxperience. Header field along with each request (defined in Section 5.5.3 of ). Today, user agents generally identify themselves to servers by sending a User-Agent HTTP request

  • 7.9 'Sec-CH-UA-Platform-Version' Header Field.
  • 7.5 'Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version-List' Header Field.
  • 7.4 'Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version' Header Field.
  • 4.1.3 Create arbitrary brand and version values.
  • 3.10 The 'Sec-CH-UA-WoW64' Header Field.
  • 3.9 The 'Sec-CH-UA-Platform-Version' Header Field.
  • 3.8 The 'Sec-CH-UA-Platform' Header Field.
  • mac users vs windows users percentage ch

    3.6 The 'Sec-CH-UA-Mobile' Header Field.3.5 The 'Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version-List' Header Field.3.4 The 'Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version' Header Field.3.3 The 'Sec-CH-UA-Bitness' Header Field.1.2.9.3 Blocking known bots and crawlers.1.2.9.1 Spam filtering and bot detection.1.2.5 Download of appropriate binary executables.1.2.3.6 Browser and OS specific experiments.







    Mac users vs windows users percentage ch